Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

In Smith v. City of Salem, Ohio, Greenamyer suspended Smith for one twenty-four hour shift, based on his alleged infraction of a City and/or Fire Department policy. Smith filed suit in the federal district court alleging:


A) pay discrimination in violation of Title VII.
B) sex discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII.
C) violation of National Relation Board by Greenamyer.
D) violation of Title VII by discriminating her on the basis of religion.

E) A) and B)
F) C) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In which of the following cases did the court hold that an employer who requires women to wear a uniform but has no such requirement for men violates Title VII?


A) Fountain v. Safeway Stores, Inc.
B) Carroll v. Talman Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.
C) Baker v. California Land Title Co.
D) Willingham v. Macon Tel. Publishing Co.

E) A) and C)
F) All of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Explain Hostile Environment Harassment.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Harassment which may not result in econo...

View Answer

Which of the following prohibits advertising for male or female employees in help-wanted notices (apart from a few exceptions) or maintaining separate seniority lists for male and female employees?


A) Bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ)
B) Section 703
C) Equal Pay Act
D) The Bennett Amendment

E) None of the above
F) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

What is the provision under Title VII with respect to gender discrimination. Explain "gender-plus" discrimination.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Title VII prohibits any discrimination i...

View Answer

Pay differentials between employees of different sexes is allowed when the differential is due to seniority, merit or productivity-based pay system, or factor other than sex under:


A) Section 704(k) of Title VII.
B) National Labor Relation Board.
C) Section 703(e) (1) of Title VII.
D) Section 703(h) of Title VII.

E) None of the above
F) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

James and Cameron applied for the position of an assistant professor at Luthans University. Though Cameron had more experience and was better qualified, her job application was rejected by the University Board. The Board felt that as a woman, Cameron would not be able to maintain discipline in her class since most of the students were male. James' job application was considered and he was later hired. In this case, the University Board:


A) violated the provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
B) does not violate Title VII since they could demonstrate a BFOQ exception.
C) does not violate Title VII but violates EEOC.
D) does not violate either Title VII or EEOC since gender was part of the required skills.

E) B) and D)
F) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

What is gender discrimination?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Gender discrimination is segregation, or...

View Answer

Jack and Adam were the employees of Steel Co. Inc. Both of them performed equal work in the industry, however, the company decided to give a 40% hike to Jack because he was senior to Adam, whereas Adam was only given a 20% pay hike to his salary. In this scenario, the company wage differential is justified under the:


A) Bennett Amendment.
B) discretionary power of company.
C) public policy exception.
D) Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.

E) A) and D)
F) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

What is the provision relating to pregnant women working in hazardous condition?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

An employer wishing to avoid potential h...

View Answer

Identify the case in which the Supreme Court held that the organization's refusal to cover pregnancy or related conditions under its sick-pay plan, in spite of having male-specific disabilities such as vasectomies covered, did not violate Title VII?


A) Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co. v. EEOC.
B) Goss v. Exxon Office Systems Co.
C) General Electric v. Gilbert.
D) U.A.W. v. Johnson Controls, Inc.

E) None of the above
F) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Scarlett applied for a job as personal shopper in a boutique for exclusive menswear. The boutique rejected her application since the job also required assisting male customers in the fitting rooms which was a business necessity and was inappropriate for a female employee. In this case, the department is justified under:


A) public policy exception.
B) bona fide occupational qualification.
C) employment-at-will.
D) gender stereotyping.

E) None of the above
F) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Define the Bennett Amendment.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The provision of Section 703(h) of Title...

View Answer

The remedies available under a government suit for the violation of Pay Discrimination Act include___________.


A) injunction and back pay with interest
B) criminal proceedings and coverage for damages
C) criminal proceedings and back pay with interest
D) injunction and coverage for damages

E) A) and D)
F) All of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In Nevada Dept. of Human Resources v. Hibbs, the Supreme Court held that the Eleventh Amendment of the Constitution does not grant the states immunity from suits for damages by employees under which of the following acts?


A) National Labor Relation Board
B) Family and Medical Leave Act
C) Equal Pay Act
D) Gender Discrimination Act

E) B) and D)
F) None of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Central Airlines decided to give 30% pay hike to stewards and 15% pay hike to stewardesses, even though they were performing substantially similar kind of work. In this case, the airlines has most likely violated the:


A) Wage and Compensation Act.
B) Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
C) National Labor Relation Board.
D) Equal Pay Act.

E) A) and D)
F) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Wendell was fired without sufficient reason by her company once they became aware of her pregnancy. The company assumed that the Wendell was likely to be absent from work for lengthy periods due to her pregnancy and the ensuing responsibilities of parenthood. In this circumstance, Wendell has a remedy under the:


A) Equal Pay Act.
B) National Labor Relation Act.
C) Pregnancy discrimination Act.
D) Occupational Safety and Health Act.

E) B) and D)
F) C) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The Equal Pay Act's coverage is similar to that of the:


A) National Labor Relation Act.
B) Pregnancy Discrimination Act.
C) Fair Labor Standards Act.
D) Occupational Safety and Health Act.

E) A) and D)
F) None of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

What are the conditions to receive family temporary disability insurance benefits?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Workers who take time off to care for a ...

View Answer

In Novak v. Metrohealth Medical Center, Donna Novak was terminated from her employment because the MetroHealth determined that Novak's March absences did not qualify for the FMLA leave. Novak filed suit against MetroHealth, alleging interference with her FMLA rights and retaliation under the FMLA. The Court of Appeals held that:


A) Novak was not entitled to FMLA leave.
B) Metro violated Title VII by terminating her.
C) Novak was entitling to FMLA leave with pay.
D) Metro should reinstate Novak.

E) B) and C)
F) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 21 - 40 of 50

Related Exams

Show Answer